Assembler Code is not run, it is:. Assembled/Compiled - There are a few choices depending on style and syntax. In that you've used Intel syntax try. There is also gnu assembler which is used when writing source code in what is called AT&T Syntax syntax.
Jan 05, 2008 The answer to your question is yes and no at the same time. You cannont natively Compile (since this is assembly code its assemble) x86 code with nasm on the OSX side of things. This is mainly because there is not an assembler for mac, but there is a way to do this. This is basically what I did last semester in my x86 class.
See. Once you compile the source code to an object code format, a linker is invoked to resolve external references and/or attaching static libraries to create an executable file. You do this with gnu linker LD.Here are examples of a two step compile/link using NASM:First compile the source code to an object file. This example is 32 bit: nasm -f macho32 -O0 helloworld.asmThis will produce a helloworld.o (object) file. You then need to finish this by linking: ld helloworld.o -o helloworldYou can now run with./helloworld.
If you pay attention to the question, the OP already HAS NASM. The OP's problems stems from trying to compile the Windows32 MASM source with NASM, which will not work at all.
Actually the NASM has some TASM compatibility switch, so simpler source may be compiled with few changes, but the resulting linux binary would just crash, as it would try to call non existent windows services. It would be maybe possible to cross-compile in Mac to produce windows executable, but the OP would still need windows (or wine) to run it, so he can as well install the free core Win SDK + with MASM.–Mar 6 '17 at 14:39.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |